Notes to broadcasters
This script is about a community who restored its swampland to its pre-degradation state, benefiting both the environment and the community. Despite being owned by the government, farmers in Sheema district in Western Uganda could access the papyrus swamp for raw materials for basket and mat making, mulch, water for domestic and farm use, and mudfish. However, some landowners living around the swampland dried it out for gazing cattle.
Wetlands are important to biodiversity and water conservation. The script explores the negative effects of clearing swamps for farming, which include a marked shortage of water, total disappearance of mulching material, and a destruction of different sources of income. The script makes a comparison between the life of farmers during the time the swamp was drained and now when the swamp has fully recovered.
This script is not a word-for-word record of interviewees’ words. To ensure that we cover key information about the script’s topic, and that all readers understand the messages, we have modified the text slightly. Interviewees are acknowledged at the end of the script.
You could use this script as inspiration to for your own interview about conserving, protecting, and restoring wetlands. Or you might choose to produce this script on your station, using voice actors to represent the speakers. If so, please make sure to tell your audience at the beginning of the program that the voices are those of actors, not the original people involved in the interviews.
If you talk to farmers or experts about wetlands and swamps, you might ask them:
- Why are wetlands important? (To biodiversity? To people?)
- Is wetland destruction an issue in this area? What changes have been seen since wetlands have been destroyed?
- Why should communities conserve or restore wetlands?
- What can convince individuals to protect and restore wetlands?
- What should farmers remember, when they are thinking of expanding their agricultural land into wetland areas? What are the short-term benefits? What are the long-term benefits?
Estimated running time for the script: 20 minutes, with intro and outro music.
Script
These are innovative yet essential tools to fight climate change. They merge indigenous viewpoints and ecosystem-based solutions to tackle climate adaptation efforts. If appropriately implemented, NbS can expedite progress towards a low-carbon, equitable, gender-inclusive, greener, and positive future. This can mean increased food production while fighting climate change at the same time.
Wetland restoration, as a Nature-based Solution, was used by farmers in Nyakambu in Sheema district, western Uganda, led by a one James Tumwebaze. He sought to regenerate the Nyakambu papyrus swamp after many years of unproductive agriculture, shortage of water for domestic use, and droughts.
Today, farmers in Nyakambu know the benefits of conserving a swamp because their source of mulching materials, basket and mat-making materials, and mudfish is back after years of depravation.
Many farmers report an increase in crop yields, better soil fertility due to availability of mulch, increased soil moisture, and a cooler environment to live in. The restored swamp has rejuvenated the incomes of people that sell mulch, basket making materials and mudfish.
Hear from a few farmers in Masheruka sub county, Sheema district to learn about NbS and how the farmers restored eight square kilometres of papyrus swamp by pushing out the farmers that had taken it over, closing the draining channels that the encroachers had dug, and letting the swamp regenerate. First, we will hear from James Tumwebaze, the man that led efforts to restore Nyakambu papyrus swamp.
Signature tune up and out
When the drought ended, the man dug channels and trenches and drained the water from the cleared area into the river in the centre of the swamp. No one really knew for many years that the man was clearing the swamp. The longer he got away with it, the more swamp he cleared.
By 2010, locals on both sides of the river, on the Mbarara side and on the Sheema side (because the river in the swamp is the boundary), they cleared the swamp and planted boundary markers to claim swampland as theirs.
So to create interest around the matter, I travelled to the National Environmental Management Authority in Mbarara and reported the offending leader. NEMA wrote to Sheema district and to Masheruka Sub County directing that the offending person should be removed from office.
And I was serious when I said we slept hungry. Droughts became so intense that our crops died more often than not. My husband would ride a bicycle to Buhweju to go and buy some potatoes and beans several times a week because our crops were no longer productive.
At some point, we had started buying water from Buhweju. We paid five hundred (500) shillings (0.14 US) for a jerry can of water. This was something we had never done. It was so bad. But now we are okay. Our swamp is back, our water is back, and we are not so badly off like then.
FADE OUT
Compared to other communities, the people of Nyakambu are very awake. They kept calling me and everyone who is involved in the protection of the environment. When they called us 2011, we said that, yeah, this is the kind of community that we needed to keep strengthening and mobilizing so that the wetland would be recovered.
Acknowledgements
Contributed by: Tony Mushoborozi, freelance journalist with Daily Monitor and content creator, Scrypta Pro Ltd., Uganda.
Reviewed by: Adolf Kalyebara, National Forestry Authority-Miyana District
Interviews:
James Tumwebaze, community leader, Sheema district, Western Uganda, May 25, 2024.
Agnes Tukahiirwa a farmer in Nyakambu community, May 25, 2024.
Pascal Tugume, Head of Natural Resources in Sheema district, May 25, 2024.